Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Lectures 5 & 6

Lecture 5—Luther’s “Theology of the Cross” (chs. 3 and 19, pp. 172-75)
Lecture 6—“The Clarity & Certainty of the Word of God”: The Life & Theology of Ulrich Zwingli
(ch. 5)

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Lectures 3 & 4

Lecture 3—“The Philosophy of Christ”: Erasmus & the Humanists (ch. 1, pp. 10-13)
Lecture 4—“A Mighty Fortress is Our God”: The Life of Martin Luther (chs. 2, 4)

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Church corruption and papal infallibility

Reading all the corruptions in churches and some popes in history, I wonder how it affects the doctrine of papal infallibility and apostolic succession claim of the Catholic church. Who is or represent the real pope during the Great Schism when there were more than one pope? I wonder what is Catholic church's explanation on this.

Here is what I found on the wikipedia on papal infallibility:
===================
Papal infallibility is the dogma in Catholic theology that, by action of the Holy Spirit, the Pope is preserved from even the possibility of error when he solemnly declares or promulgates to the universal Church a dogmatic teaching on faith or morals as being contained in divine revelation, or at least being intimately connected to divine revelation. ...
This dogma, however, does not state either that the Pope cannot commit sin in his own personal life nor that he is necessarily free of error, even when speaking in his official capacity, outside the specific contexts in which the dogma applies.

This doctrine was defined dogmatically in the First Vatican Council of 1870.
============
Interesting position! Can this be compared to the inspiration of the Scripture? Prophets and apostles are not perfect, yet inspired for inerrancy for the portion of the Scripture they wrote. If this is the case, should Pope's proclaimation go through the same standard as we used for the canon of the Scripture? In this case, any pope is also more "inspried" than any of the authors of the Bible because we do not have such claim for any of them.
I also wonder if those corrupted popes in the history made any wrong claims.

I think we will learn more about reformers' position on apostolic succession later.

Friday, October 2, 2009

Lecture 1 & 2

Lecture 1—“A Long Preface”: Introduction to Reformation & Modern Church History
Lecture 2—“The Mouse that Roared”: The Context of the Reformation (Reading: Gonzalez, ch. 1, pp. 6-10)

Class Material

We can have two resources available for this study, one from CTS and
one from RTS. We will follow the CTS Worldclass syllabus for class and
use the RTS iTune mp3s as a supplement because we have more material from
CTS.

Textbooks:
1. Gonzales, Justo L., The Story of Christianity. Vol. 2. New York:
HarperCollins, 1985.
2. McGrath, Alister E. Reformation Thought: An Introduction. 3rd Ed.
Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.

CTS Worldclass
http://www.worldwide-classroom.com/

RTS on iTunes U
http://itunes.rts.edu/

Please comment and let me know your thoughts or suggestions.
Thank you.